Naval History Forums

Anti-AGW is a conspiracy theory. The big bad LIBRULS are trying to take people's 102" TV. Non-critical thinkers often accept conspiracy theories, at least until they realize the BS that they're built on. So here we are discussing science using critical thinking and you come along and present a........

Anti-AGW is a conspiracy theory. The big bad LIBRULS are trying to take people's 102" TV. Non-critical thinkers often accept conspiracy theories, at least until they realize the BS that they're built on.

RF wrote: ↑

Wed Feb 20, 2019 9:50 am

OpanaPointer wrote: ↑

Wed Feb 20, 2019 1:30 am

And that's a conspiracy theory, folks.

What is? That there are lobbyists and vested interests? Where is the theory?

Or is it that the Earth's climate is subject to micro-climatic change?

Resistance to AGW is based on selfishness.

How the argument will end, I'm afraid. https://i.imgur.com/07m59ee.jpg No. The 'argument' will not end because it is pursued by vested academic interests and their lobbyists in the IPCC and the EU. What will happen is that climatic variation will be managed over time by improvements in technology a...

There's a lot of hits on Google, one of them may be the charm.

Sorry, I don't do conspiracy theories. You don't do conspiracy theories - that is a cliché. You resort to clichés to avoid any argument against the evidence you don't want to consider. You don't want to consider the evidence because you have no arguments to refute it and your mind is closed to any ...

Sorry, I don't do conspiracy theories.

"The Navies of the World - Their Present State and Future Capabilities", by Hans Busk https://archive.org/details/naviesworld ... og/page/n8

How the argument will end, I'm afraid.

Unmanned drone tanks, AFVs, etc. are being considered. Not macho enough for the old school, I think. Hmmm ..... remotely guided/operated drones of all types are undeniably here to stay. I am however troubled by the potentially dangerous unintended consequences of the inevitable next technological s...

For the really ... difficult ... documents I've used voice recognition over OCR or just retyping the documents. The process is at the point where it makes fewer mistakes. For speckled* documents it beats FineReader hands down. *Many documents were printed on green paper, "file copy", and have been c...

Dave Saxton wrote: ↑

Fri Dec 21, 2018 8:25 pm

WPL-46 is Rainbow 5

Yep. But Orange was superseded by Rainbow-5. I have the other Rainbow plans online somewhere.

It's rather pointless to talk about plans there were never used. WPL-46 was the plan we went to war with.

Do feel free to replicate files from Hyperwar. We want that information to get out and about.

And you might find some new things here: http://www.ibiblio.org/hyperwar/NHC/NewPDFs/