Search found 3150 matches
- Wed Apr 23, 2008 3:56 am
- Forum: Naval Weapons
- Topic: Allied search radars
- Replies: 51
- Views: 27541
Re: Allied search radars
Hi dunmunro, It's very difficult to find good information on those radars that is also based on solid sources. I tend to have little faith in internet sourced material as well. A good study could be done, but it hasn't been done that I'm aware of. It should be done. From the few words given by a few...
- Tue Apr 22, 2008 5:27 am
- Forum: Naval Weapons
- Topic: Allied search radars
- Replies: 51
- Views: 27541
USN search radars
CXAM, SC and SK These are all based on the same basic 1.5 meter wave length radar system design. These radars were built by RCA based on a prototype developed by the Naval Research Lab called the XAF. The XAF was first tested in early 1939, and the Navy was jazzed that it could track shells in flig...
- Mon Apr 21, 2008 3:47 pm
- Forum: Naval Weapons
- Topic: Allied search radars
- Replies: 51
- Views: 27541
Allied search radars
Type 279 The first radar used on Royal Navy warships was Type 79 with the first sea trials conducted in early 1939. It operated on a wave length of 7.5 meters. Type 279 was an improved version. The antennas consisted of a send antenna, and receive antenna, each placed at the mast head of the forema...
- Sun Apr 20, 2008 3:52 pm
- Forum: Bismarck General Discussion
- Topic: Who designed the Bismarck
- Replies: 34
- Views: 10576
Re: Who designed the Bismarck
The role of private industry was indeed much more prominate in Germany than in most other nations. For example, radar was centered in the private and competing companies of Telefunken, Lorenz, and GEMA. Military agencies such as the NVA and Sonder Kommision-Radar (actually consisting of scientists f...
- Sun Apr 20, 2008 3:13 pm
- Forum: Bismarck General Discussion
- Topic: Who designed the Bismarck
- Replies: 34
- Views: 10576
Re: Who designed the Bismarck
Heye was a member of Raeder's staff and also a member of the committee that was fleshing out the Z-Plan. As Thomas has written, Heye made a draft that criticized the Z-Plan as unfeasable. He was also asked to come up with a set of general specifications for the planned warships. Heye sought the expe...
- Tue Apr 15, 2008 3:27 pm
- Forum: Naval History (1922-1945)
- Topic: U-Boat Losses in World War II
- Replies: 19
- Views: 11283
Re: U-Boat Losses in World War II
The Battle of the Atlantic was orders of magnatude greater in scale and intensity compared to these other submarine campaigns. Based on post war evaluations of records, U-boats sank 7.8 million tons of shipping in 1942 alone. This was greater than the Japanese total merchant marine losses. Usually a...
- Tue Apr 15, 2008 1:47 am
- Forum: Naval History (1922-1945)
- Topic: U-Boat Losses in World War II
- Replies: 19
- Views: 11283
Re: U-Boat Losses in World War II
Here's some data on USN sub ops in the the Pacific. A report called JANAC was completed in 1947, although it was accepted that confirming all the claims and coming up with precise data would be impossible. Part of the problem was that many Japanese records needed for comparison were poorly kept or w...
- Mon Apr 14, 2008 3:47 pm
- Forum: Naval History (1922-1945)
- Topic: U-Boat Losses in World War II
- Replies: 19
- Views: 11283
Re: U-Boat Losses in World War II
Rohwer's data suggests that 630 U-boats were lost in actual combat operations vs Allied shipping. 123 were lost at base or home waters to enemy air raids, mines, and accidents. That's 753, or very close to Jose's result. 11 were captured by the enemy or interned in neutral harbors. 153 were surender...
- Mon Apr 14, 2008 3:36 pm
- Forum: Naval History (1922-1945)
- Topic: U-Boat Losses in World War II
- Replies: 19
- Views: 11283
Re: U-Boat Losses in World War II
It would be interesting to compare the U-boat losses/Allied ships sunk with the US subs lost/Jap ships sunk in the Pacific..... It's difficult to make that an apples to apples comparison, because the IJN was not really interested in anti-submarine warfare, and when they did reluctantly attempt ASW,...
- Sun Apr 13, 2008 10:25 pm
- Forum: Naval History (1922-1945)
- Topic: U-Boat Losses in World War II
- Replies: 19
- Views: 11283
Re: U-Boat Losses in World War II
Very good! Have you seen Jurgen Rohwer's data? Rohwer breaks down losses into sub- catagories, such as where the losses occured and what the U-boat was doing. As your data suggests, losses started to spike in May 1943. This was the time when the Allies began equiping patrol bombers with radars that ...
- Sat Apr 12, 2008 6:40 pm
- Forum: Hypothetical Naval Scenarios
- Topic: Bismarck vs. Hood
- Replies: 61
- Views: 18450
Re: Bismarck vs. Hood
Karl, Germany was up against it not only because of the number of Allies arrayed against, but also because it could in no way match the industrial capacity of the United States. The US out produced the combined Axis many times over by itself. German industrial capacity could not keep up. This was ev...
- Fri Apr 11, 2008 3:35 pm
- Forum: Bismarck General Discussion
- Topic: Bismarck construction flaws
- Replies: 397
- Views: 291034
Re: RADAR
Another flaw that I may add, is the lack of adequate RADAR. This was not necesarily a design flaw more than a cosmetic and strategic one. This was not necesarily their fault, but im sure that better sets would have been created later in the war But don't forget that the Reichsmarine knew about rada...
- Wed Apr 02, 2008 3:34 pm
- Forum: Off Topic
- Topic: Virginia Tech
- Replies: 45
- Views: 14166
The 55 mph speed limit was just silly. In fact on some roads sections out in the vast west of the USA, any speed limit is silly. In many cases driving slower doesn't save fuel either. What was supposed to be a temporary measure turned into a rediculous, unpopular, and unenforcable, albastross lastin...
- Tue Apr 01, 2008 3:58 pm
- Forum: Off Topic
- Topic: Virginia Tech
- Replies: 45
- Views: 14166
The rights of States and those of the Federal Gov are ambigious, and probably intentionally so. This allows difficult issues to be haggled out on a case by case basis. The courts have had to deal with such issues for 220 years. The Interstate Commerce Clause of the Constitution gives the Federal Gov...
- Fri Mar 28, 2008 3:59 pm
- Forum: Off Topic
- Topic: Virginia Tech
- Replies: 45
- Views: 14166
RF, Your quite correct that there is a fundamental difference between how the American founding fathers and framers of the US Constitution define rights, and how rights are defined in most other democracies. In America the rights and liberties of the individual are paramount. Central to the American...