Paul, I think you have to be more specific in stating that Mr. Jurens is not culpable and the "slanging match" is really a one sided temper tantrum from someone who now only seems to post only to troll the forum.paul.mercer wrote: ↑Tue Jun 04, 2019 5:46 pmGentlemen,
Once again yet another topic has ended up as a rather bad tempered slanging match, this time even involving our moderator who (as always)is doing his very best to keep the peace.Surely, as adults, it must be possible to discuss and debate each others theories and opinions without getting to the stage where contributors are suspended or the thread being locked because we will not accept someones views - even if they are deemed as outrageous by fellow contributors! This forum has given all of us a great deal of pleasure over the years and has no doubt contributed a huge amount of knowledge to us all on a great many subjects and not just Bismarck herself, if this type of aggressive posting carries on every time a new topic is introduced we are in great danger of Bill Jurens getting fed up with the bickering and having to intervene and the whole Forum being closed down by Mr Rico.
Please gentlemen,for the sake of this Forum, let's cool it down a bit and think about our replies and not pour scorn on each others points of view because we do not agree with them.
Come on chaps, we can do this!
The facts are that once A&A put forward their "cowardice and coverup" theory they stepped beyond the pale as serious historians and the resulting years of increasing invective was inevitable. A&A's theory was assembled using the same pseudoscience used by UFO researchers and not surprisingly they managed to hoodwink the odd person along their way.