Portholes bow and stern

Discussions about the history of the ship, technical details, etc.

Moderator: Bill Jurens

Bgile
Senior Member
Posts: 3658
Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2005 7:33 pm
Location: Portland, OR, USA

Re: Portholes bow and stern

Post by Bgile » Mon May 19, 2008 4:57 pm

I don't think I've ever known of a porthole in armor plate. The ones I have seen were in unarmored parts of the ship. I think US ships had all hull portholes plated over when they had a yard availability because of the flooding hazard. I believe all wooden furnishings were also removed to reduce fire danger.

User avatar
30knots
Member
Posts: 122
Joined: Sun Nov 11, 2007 1:02 pm
Location: Scotland

Re: Portholes bow and stern

Post by 30knots » Tue May 20, 2008 10:10 pm

guys,

I'd just like to point out my very first post:
Bismarck had a few portholes each side at the bow and stern, outwith the armour belt.
I was never suggesting Bismarck had portholes along the citadel section.

No probs though.

EDIT: sorry, wrong end of the stick this post. Feel free to continue.

lwd
Senior Member
Posts: 3810
Joined: Sat Jun 17, 2006 2:15 am
Location: Southfield, USA

Re: Portholes bow and stern

Post by lwd » Wed May 21, 2008 2:46 am

I think someone suggested that the twins had portals in the citadel. Conversations do tend to wander a bit around here.

Tiornu
Supporter
Posts: 1222
Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 6:13 am
Location: Ex Utero

Re: Portholes bow and stern

Post by Tiornu » Wed May 21, 2008 3:30 am

The Twins lacked a substantial upper belt.

Post Reply