@ Bill Jurens,
of course in line of principle I can easily agree on what you wrote above, and I thank you for the credits on my hard work on this battle map on the last 15 years.
You surely remember when and where I started on 2003, ... with R. Winklareth pretending to sell his reverse photo theory ( without having produced a battle map

Today, ... even if we can always improve it, ... we do have a reliable battle map based on the evidence at hand we have available, ... and it is very similar to the 1980 by the Baron/Schmalenbach/Rohwer, ... basically the Prinz Eugen original track and the PoW one, ... plus the recent addition of the Suffolk and Norfolk tracks I worked on lately, ... because the warships were 6 and not only 4 in the battle field area that morning, ...

The map is also in line with the most reliable official battle data, the timings and the accounts, ... not only with the original battle map main tracks on both sides of PG and PoW, ... and Hood plus BS are not so difficult to be added on top of the PG and PoW ones.
When someone will be able to produce a better one, ... with associated evidence supporting it, ... I will be happy to evaluate it.
Surely we cannot even take in account those old versions disregarded even by who produced them at first, ... that was a " joke " only showing the very poor competences of the one who pretended to propose it as an alternative option, ... another miserable failed attempt to try to discredit, ... for the known reasons.
Bye Antonio