Yeah, the recorded facts don't match your theory so rather than revise your theory to match the facts...you accuse all the principles of being liars, cowards and criminal conspirators....Antonio Bonomi wrote: ↑Tue Jul 24, 2018 10:25 pmHello everybody,
as I have stated on another thread, I confirm that Capt Ellis, like many others, has been an intentional liar about what happened, by intentionally omitting some facts ( his real distance at certain point of 18.000 yards from the enemy ), …. and substituting them with other facts ( the mirage ) in order to justify what he did after 05:42, … the " U turn and circle " away from the enemy after having received the " Enemy in sight ! " from Holland squadron ( BC 1 ).
I do not care how many reports and when he wrote them, … he lied intentionally as explained above, … and only when he wrote his own autobiography he wrote the real facts ( I hope all of them ).
As a confirmation, … it is enough to plot the Suffolk track respecting her own bearings at various stages to realize it and to verify what from Prinz Eugen ( Busch radar and bearing soon after 05:30 and the bridge bearing at 05:50 ) they have measured correctly, … in line with Capt Ellis autobiography declarations and … omitted on his original report that just like Adm Tovey dispatches is just written in an intentional misleading way.
Intentional liars, … omitting key data and reasons for their actions, … and writing misleading statements instead with false justifications.
Theory that UFOs = space aliens -> reports challenge space alien visitation theory ->therefore...(wait for it) reports must be evidence of conspiracy and cover-up... Problem of theory being at odds with the facts is solved
Now we can get on with solving the Kennedy assassination and the global warming myth...