The Norfolk and Suffolk tracks at Denmark Strait

Discussions about the history of the ship, technical details, etc.

Moderator: Bill Jurens

HMSVF
Senior Member
Posts: 347
Joined: Sun Jun 17, 2018 10:15 am

Re: The Norfolk and Suffolk tracks at Denmark Strait

Post by HMSVF »

wadinga wrote: Sat Aug 11, 2018 12:16 am Hello Antonio,

You really do miss the point, don't you?. You are accusing Ellis of lying, but why is he lying before the battle has even been fought? Before Hood has been sunk? What would be the point of pretending he was further away from Bismarck than he really was?

You have fabricated a Conspiracy taking place after the battle, out of your own imagination, and alleged the evidence has been changed to support it,

You have alleged over and over that every inconvenient item in the records have been changed, but these reports from before the battle have been in German hands not British. Like the Baron's words they render your imaginative fantasy baseless.

The only bla,bla bla is the endless reposting of your worthless mapping, (this still has the same constant speed marks after two high speed 50 degree turns and a new fabricated Norfolk track)) distorted by the need to solely serve your purposes, and the endless restating of a few trivial and irrelevant changes in reports based on the reasonable reconciliation and collation of information from detached forces.


Instead of telling people who disagree with you to "shut up" maybe you should have a nice lie down.


All the best

wadinga
From the appendix of "The Great Ships Pass" by Peter Smith. (pages 432 - 433)
The Rodney finally got he refit after this operation, which lead to the typical postwar claim that because of this, the Bismarck may well have caused heavy damage in the last fight: "American reports told of severe damage to the Rodney which, subsequently, had to go to the ship yard in Boston" - Cmdr PaulK.M Schmalenbach Bismarck. That such an unfounded implication should be blithely published by a British publisher in 1972 shows just how the wish to believe anything asserted by our former enemies as true and discard the British version as a "cover up" has spread. As with the Royal Oak affair, the mining of the Nelson,the sinking of the Helle,the rewriting of history goes on at an alarming pace until we shall all be told how terrible was that the Axis lost the war.

:wink:




Best wishes


HMSVF
User avatar
Antonio Bonomi
Senior Member
Posts: 3799
Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2004 10:44 am
Location: Vimercate ( Milano ) - Italy

Re: The Norfolk and Suffolk tracks at Denmark Strait

Post by Antonio Bonomi »

Hello everybody,

neither for a second I thought that a map showing something different ( surely not better ) or an agreement about what that Norfolk map shows was going to be written.

That is a map very easily made by just using the official bearings agreed among fair persons writing in this forum ( including Herr Nillson ) ... :wink:

Too difficult now to admit the truth for the " deniers ", ... better to complain about an additional track traced on top of the original Pinchin track, ... not to admit that thru the use of those bearings the map is correct in that way, ... and nobody can state anything different.

This alone, ... tells with who we are dealing here in currently.

Better to remain with the Pichin false map and Norfolk been a " ghost " in the ocean ... sailing somewhere in that area ... despite having the possibility to realize something a lot more precise.

" Everything is better than the truth " ... what a shame.

Bye Antonio
In order to honor a soldier, we have to tell the truth about what happened over there. The whole, hard, cold truth. And until we do that, we dishonor her and every soldier who died, who gave their life for their country. ( Courage Under Fire )
Post Reply