I don't even know what a "warmist" is, I can only guess.
Right, I don't know a lot of climate change, and I never claimed that.
The great majority of people are agnostic about ''climate change' including the science professions.
Yet you chimed in by claiming that my example of lobbyists promoting AGW was a nonsense, without offering any evidence beyond vague claims about peer reviews of published literature on the subject, which I have already responded to.
So why make the claim? As I have already said, a more open person would have asked why I mentioned it as an example of political correctness and not as you have done denounced it.
And RF, I never attributed you or anybody else here as a right-winger. I don't know any of you to make such a statement. This is a general statement to describe a movement or group in the society, a label. Like "the" media or "the" liberals.
No, but you inferred it, just as you tried to associate my view with that of President Trump, who you evidently disapprove of.
You are quite right, you do not know me, just as you did not expect me to show that AGW is promoted by lobbyists using political campaigning tactics. What your view does show is that a lot of people have blandly accepted the view of these lobbyists without stopping to think hard about it and this is the essence of effective propaganda. I always remember the mantra of Joseph Geobbels - the bigger the lie, the more likely it is to be believed.
''Give me a Ping and one Ping only'' - Sean Connery.