Loss of sterns on German ships
-
- Member
- Posts: 113
- Joined: Tue Nov 14, 2006 3:38 pm
- Location: Tavistock, West Devon
Loss of sterns on German ships
I'm sorry if this has been asked before, but I am almost finished reading 'Scharnhorst' by Alf.R Jacobsen and in it he describes the wreck as having lost her stern (I think the bow section was blown off by a magazine explosion).
As Bismarck and I believe another large German warship, (Blucher or Prinz Eugan?) also had problems and lost their sterns I wonder if it was a weakness of the German ships?
Or, on another thought, could the damage to Bismark and Scharnhorst be due to scuttling charges?
As Bismarck and I believe another large German warship, (Blucher or Prinz Eugan?) also had problems and lost their sterns I wonder if it was a weakness of the German ships?
Or, on another thought, could the damage to Bismark and Scharnhorst be due to scuttling charges?
- José M. Rico
- Administrator
- Posts: 1008
- Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 10:23 am
- Location: Madrid, Spain
- Contact:
Yes, it has been discussed before, but it's OK, feel free to do it here again (or reply to any of the already existing threads about it). Here are two threads that may be of interest to you:
viewtopic.php?t=110
viewtopic.php?t=117
viewtopic.php?t=110
viewtopic.php?t=117
Re: Loss of sterns on German ships
As I recall, Scharnhorst's stern is not like the others but is broken off with a jagged rip. The other cases showed a clean break. In those cases, the line of discontinuity appears to have been along the edge of an armored bulkhead. In Bismarck's case, it was nothing important, just a little nub at the extreme stern, but the cruisers had more serious issues.
Re: Loss of sterns on German ships
There was a structural weakness in the stern of German warships.paul mercer wrote:As Bismarck and I believe another large German warship, (Blucher or Prinz Eugan?) also had problems and lost their sterns I wonder if it was a weakness of the German ships?
Or, on another thought, could the damage to Bismark and Scharnhorst be due to scuttling charges?
Bismarck (26/5/1941), Lutzow (June 1941) and Prinz Eugen (April 1942) were all torpedoed once in the stern and the stern section failed in each case.
I gather that with the latter two ships the Germans sought to remedy the problem by strengthening the armour plating. Whether this would have been any good was never tested by a repeat hit....
''Give me a Ping and one Ping only'' - Sean Connery.
Re: Loss of sterns on German ships
What indication is there that Bismarck's stern failed as a result of torpedo damage?
Stregnthening the armor plating would have no effect of the failure of joints.
Stregnthening the armor plating would have no effect of the failure of joints.
- Terje Langoy
- Supporter
- Posts: 435
- Joined: Wed Aug 09, 2006 4:15 pm
- Location: Bergen, Norway
Hello, everybody.
RF, are you sure that the Lützow had her stern failure in June 1941? I've read that she was torpedoed by Trident (or was it Spearfish?) 10th April 1940, while enroute to Kiel. She suffered severe damage to her stern and was tied up in the dockyards uptil spring of 1941... But I don't recall whether the stern almost separated at that time or in June 1941, as you say... Now I became even less sure of the actual time.
Tiornu, did the stern part broke off due to the lack of supportive joint bulkheads? It was well behind the aft perpendicular and so forth was maybe recognized as a section of less priority during construction? Since the section broke off as she capsized, could the weight of water filling up inside have contributed to the loss?
Back to the Lützow, didn't she have to be towed to port afterwards? The Prinz was able to continue by controlling the rudder by wires on the capstans. The stern damage were of quite different nature aboard those two ships. It was more than just the end section aboard the Lützow, her entire quarter deck was bent in an ugly angle. The Prinz lost the section aft of her perpendicular and as I understand from Tiornu's post just the extreme end of the stern aboard Bismarck were lost. This section perhaps suffered from the sea state during the night as well as being filled with water? (Closed wet surfaces that gave constant changes regarding centre of weight) Could this contribute to a further weakening of the joints?
Very best regards
RF, are you sure that the Lützow had her stern failure in June 1941? I've read that she was torpedoed by Trident (or was it Spearfish?) 10th April 1940, while enroute to Kiel. She suffered severe damage to her stern and was tied up in the dockyards uptil spring of 1941... But I don't recall whether the stern almost separated at that time or in June 1941, as you say... Now I became even less sure of the actual time.
Tiornu, did the stern part broke off due to the lack of supportive joint bulkheads? It was well behind the aft perpendicular and so forth was maybe recognized as a section of less priority during construction? Since the section broke off as she capsized, could the weight of water filling up inside have contributed to the loss?
Back to the Lützow, didn't she have to be towed to port afterwards? The Prinz was able to continue by controlling the rudder by wires on the capstans. The stern damage were of quite different nature aboard those two ships. It was more than just the end section aboard the Lützow, her entire quarter deck was bent in an ugly angle. The Prinz lost the section aft of her perpendicular and as I understand from Tiornu's post just the extreme end of the stern aboard Bismarck were lost. This section perhaps suffered from the sea state during the night as well as being filled with water? (Closed wet surfaces that gave constant changes regarding centre of weight) Could this contribute to a further weakening of the joints?
Very best regards
-
- Member
- Posts: 113
- Joined: Tue Nov 14, 2006 3:38 pm
- Location: Tavistock, West Devon
Is there any evidence that the stern broke away on the surface?
I would have thought that as she hit the underwater mountain or whatever it was, the bow would have hit first then the stern would hit with an almighty wallop, possibly causing the stern to snap off. Alternatively the stern could have hit first and broken off on impact, which is why it is nowhere near the rest of the ship.
Any thoughts?
I would have thought that as she hit the underwater mountain or whatever it was, the bow would have hit first then the stern would hit with an almighty wallop, possibly causing the stern to snap off. Alternatively the stern could have hit first and broken off on impact, which is why it is nowhere near the rest of the ship.
Any thoughts?
I believe that Lutzow was torpedoed by Spearfish in the Kattegatt in June 1941, which aborted an intended raiding cruise in the Atlantic immediately after Rheiubung before Hitler forbade such further operations.Terje Langoy wrote:Hello, everybody.
RF, are you sure that the Lützow had her stern failure in June 1941? I've read that she was torpedoed by Trident (or was it Spearfish?) 10th April 1940, while enroute to Kiel. She suffered severe damage to her stern and was tied up in the dockyards uptil spring of 1941... But I don't recall whether the stern almost separated at that time or in June 1941, as you say... Now I became even less sure of the actual time.
Back to the Lützow, didn't she have to be towed to port afterwards? Very best regards
''Give me a Ping and one Ping only'' - Sean Connery.
Re: Loss of sterns on German ships
This is based on the evidence of Ballard.Tiornu wrote:What indication is there that Bismarck's stern failed as a result of torpedo damage?
Stregnthening the armor plating would have no effect of the failure of joints.
As I said in my thread there were no repeat stern hits to test whether the strengthening worked or not.
''Give me a Ping and one Ping only'' - Sean Connery.
- Terje Langoy
- Supporter
- Posts: 435
- Joined: Wed Aug 09, 2006 4:15 pm
- Location: Bergen, Norway
- Terje Langoy
- Supporter
- Posts: 435
- Joined: Wed Aug 09, 2006 4:15 pm
- Location: Bergen, Norway
Hello, RF...
I was sitting here looking in some books when a picture appeared before me. (And I seriously consider to use my books rather than a quick search on the net from now on) You see, the severe stern damage of the Lützow did in fact occur on her return from Oslo, according to Siegfried Breyer & Gerhard Koop. There's a image from her arrival in Kiel, 13th April 1940, in the book "German navy at War 1935 - 1945" and the stern certainly don't look too good at this image. (The only visible part of the quarter deck is the torpedo tubes) So forth, I can only conclude that June 1941 can't be the date... I trust Koop & Breyer to know what they're talking about.
Very best regards
I was sitting here looking in some books when a picture appeared before me. (And I seriously consider to use my books rather than a quick search on the net from now on) You see, the severe stern damage of the Lützow did in fact occur on her return from Oslo, according to Siegfried Breyer & Gerhard Koop. There's a image from her arrival in Kiel, 13th April 1940, in the book "German navy at War 1935 - 1945" and the stern certainly don't look too good at this image. (The only visible part of the quarter deck is the torpedo tubes) So forth, I can only conclude that June 1941 can't be the date... I trust Koop & Breyer to know what they're talking about.
Very best regards
- Antonio Bonomi
- Senior Member
- Posts: 3799
- Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2004 10:44 am
- Location: Vimercate ( Milano ) - Italy
Lutzow torpedoed
Ciao RF, Terje and all,
Lutzow was torpedoed on April 1940 ( submarine HMS Spearfish ) on his way back from Oslo to Germany and also on June 1941 ( a Bristol Beaufighter torpedo bomber airplane ) while trying to reach Trondheim in Norway from Germany.
Just refer to my ship history plans :
viewtopic.php?p=3180#3180
Hope this helps .....
Ciao Antonio
Lutzow was torpedoed on April 1940 ( submarine HMS Spearfish ) on his way back from Oslo to Germany and also on June 1941 ( a Bristol Beaufighter torpedo bomber airplane ) while trying to reach Trondheim in Norway from Germany.
Just refer to my ship history plans :
viewtopic.php?p=3180#3180
Hope this helps .....
Ciao Antonio
- Terje Langoy
- Supporter
- Posts: 435
- Joined: Wed Aug 09, 2006 4:15 pm
- Location: Bergen, Norway
Re: Lutzow torpedoed
Your plans are excellent, Antonio...Antonio Bonomi wrote:Ciao RF, Terje and all,
Lutzow was torpedoed on April 1940 ( submarine HMS Spearfish ) on his way back from Oslo to Germany and also on June 1941 ( a Bristol Beaufighter torpedo bomber airplane ) while trying to reach Trondheim in Norway from Germany.
Just refer to my ship history plans :
viewtopic.php?p=3180#3180
Hope this helps .....
Ciao Antonio
Best regards
- Antonio Bonomi
- Senior Member
- Posts: 3799
- Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2004 10:44 am
- Location: Vimercate ( Milano ) - Italy
Plans
Ciao Terje and all,
I am glad they are useful,.. I made them just as a quick reference mainly for the ship evolutions ( drawings with numbers and camo with letters ) but they can e easily used as main reference for the ship main events.
Happy Easter to everybody, ...
.....I am just back from a wonderful France trip....
Ciao Antonio
I am glad they are useful,.. I made them just as a quick reference mainly for the ship evolutions ( drawings with numbers and camo with letters ) but they can e easily used as main reference for the ship main events.
Happy Easter to everybody, ...
.....I am just back from a wonderful France trip....
Ciao Antonio
Re: Lutzow torpedoed
I believe it was not a Beaufighter but a Beaufort bomber.a Bristol Beaufighter torpedo bomber airplane