Serious design flaws in King George V class Battleships?

Warship design and construction, terminology, navigation, hydrodynamics, stability, armor schemes, damage control, etc.
alecsandros
Senior Member
Posts: 3990
Joined: Wed Oct 14, 2009 2:33 pm
Location: Bucharest, Romania
Contact:

Re: Serious design flaws in King George V class Battleships?

Postby alecsandros » Thu Aug 04, 2016 5:32 am

But if it is same battle as above, there is a difference between the ranges reported by the 2 sides (a situation not at all uncommon...)

dunmunro
Senior Member
Posts: 3097
Joined: Sat Oct 22, 2005 1:25 am
Location: Langley BC Canada

Re: Serious design flaws in King George V class Battleships?

Postby dunmunro » Thu Aug 04, 2016 5:54 am

alecsandros wrote:But if it is same battle as above, there is a difference between the ranges reported by the 2 sides (a situation not at all uncommon...)


Sydney plotted the ranges on her AFCT which created a permanent record via its plotter output and the ranges in the Battle Summary are those recorded during the battle.

The RM ranges may have suffered from translation errors or maybe they just had incorrect ranges and that accounts for their poor shooting.

alecsandros
Senior Member
Posts: 3990
Joined: Wed Oct 14, 2009 2:33 pm
Location: Bucharest, Romania
Contact:

Re: Serious design flaws in King George V class Battleships?

Postby alecsandros » Thu Aug 04, 2016 5:57 am

Are you sure it's the same battle ?

dunmunro
Senior Member
Posts: 3097
Joined: Sat Oct 22, 2005 1:25 am
Location: Langley BC Canada

Re: Serious design flaws in King George V class Battleships?

Postby dunmunro » Thu Aug 04, 2016 6:15 am

alecsandros wrote:Are you sure it's the same battle ?


http://www.world-war.co.uk/sydney_story.php3

the ranges are from Sydney's action report.

alecsandros
Senior Member
Posts: 3990
Joined: Wed Oct 14, 2009 2:33 pm
Location: Bucharest, Romania
Contact:

Re: Serious design flaws in King George V class Battleships?

Postby alecsandros » Thu Aug 04, 2016 6:21 am


alecsandros
Senior Member
Posts: 3990
Joined: Wed Oct 14, 2009 2:33 pm
Location: Bucharest, Romania
Contact:

Re: Serious design flaws in King George V class Battleships?

Postby alecsandros » Thu Aug 04, 2016 6:23 am

Anyway, it's a digression from the discussion,
as Sidney did not have 5.25" guns, and her target wasn't a destroyer, but a light cruiser.

For the record , Sidney's ammo consumption at Cape Spada was 963 x 6" rounds.

Harry Lime
Junior Member
Posts: 6
Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2016 12:21 pm

Re: Serious design flaws in King George V class Battleships?

Postby Harry Lime » Thu Aug 04, 2016 3:03 pm

Thanks for posting your interesting material dunmonro. I think we can agree that HMAS Sydney scored hits at about 18,000 yards possibly a little more, UP to maybe 20,000 yards.


Return to “Naval Technology”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest