USS Arizona vs. Bizmark
-
- Senior Member
- Posts: 408
- Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2009 5:50 pm
- Location: North Carolina, USA
Re: USS Arizona vs. Bizmark
Arizona, when she outgunned everything in the German navy
- Attachments
-
- Arizona D.JPG (65.74 KiB) Viewed 2145 times
Shift Colors... underway.
- Karl Heidenreich
- Senior Member
- Posts: 4808
- Joined: Thu Jan 12, 2006 3:19 pm
- Location: San José, Costa Rica
Re: USS Arizona vs. Bizmark
Yellowtail;
Do you have that photo in HD?
Do you have that photo in HD?
An appeaser is one who feeds a crocodile, hoping it will eat him last.
Sir Winston Churchill
Sir Winston Churchill
-
- Senior Member
- Posts: 408
- Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2009 5:50 pm
- Location: North Carolina, USA
Re: USS Arizona vs. Bizmark
ah... I think so, but now I can't find it on my hard drive. Here's another, though -Karl Heidenreich wrote:Yellowtail;
Do you have that photo in HD?
- Attachments
-
- Arizona aft turrets.jpg (51.19 KiB) Viewed 2127 times
Shift Colors... underway.
Re: USS Arizona vs. Bizmark
Impressive, most impressive
God created the world in 6 days.........and on the 7th day he built the Scharnhorst
- Karl Heidenreich
- Senior Member
- Posts: 4808
- Joined: Thu Jan 12, 2006 3:19 pm
- Location: San José, Costa Rica
Re: USS Arizona vs. Bizmark
yellowtail;
With all due respect: give me that photo!
With all due respect: give me that photo!
An appeaser is one who feeds a crocodile, hoping it will eat him last.
Sir Winston Churchill
Sir Winston Churchill
Re: USS Arizona vs. Bizmark
From my totally non-technical eye it appears that the relative turret size for the triple gun arrangement is smaller than the KM equivalent relative to the smaller KM calibre (11 inch guns) as the three gun barrels on Arizona are very close together, they almost appear pushed against each other, whereas on the pocket battleships and Scharnhorst the triple guns appear further apart?
I think on the KGV and Dunkerque class quad turrets the guns were also further apart?
Does this have any implication for loading and firing these guns?
I think on the KGV and Dunkerque class quad turrets the guns were also further apart?
Does this have any implication for loading and firing these guns?
''Give me a Ping and one Ping only'' - Sean Connery.
-
- Senior Member
- Posts: 408
- Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2009 5:50 pm
- Location: North Carolina, USA
Re: USS Arizona vs. Bizmark
Your eye is just fine.RF wrote:From my totally non-technical eye it appears that the relative turret size for the triple gun arrangement is smaller than the KM equivalent relative to the smaller KM calibre (11 inch guns) as the three gun barrels on Arizona are very close together, they almost appear pushed against each other, whereas on the pocket battleships and Scharnhorst the triple guns appear further apart?
I think on the KGV and Dunkerque class quad turrets the guns were also further apart? Does this have any implication for loading and firing these guns?
In Nevada and Pennsylvania's there is no bulkhead between the guns in the turret; all three share the same elevation gear, and the breeches of the 14"/45 triples were very close together. Interestingly - according to Navweaps? - the Scharnhorst's turrets weigh more than Arizona's triples (but they did shoot faster, with shells weighing about half as much)The following 14" battleships (New Mexicos & Tennessees) went to individually sleeved 14"/50s.
I've seen a photo of the 14"/45 triple turret interior, but don't know where. This is a still from film Here Comes the Navy, which was filmed onboard Arizona (there's James Cagney in the middle). This scene was actually filmed in a mock-up of the turret. Here ya go...
http://www.tcm.com/mediaroom/index.jsp?cid=135414
I'm not absolutely certain, but... I believe the last time a 14"/45cal triple turret was fired, was one of Arizona's aft turrets in Hawaii in 1945. 99% sure.
- Attachments
-
- interior from HCTN mockup.JPG (34.68 KiB) Viewed 2096 times
Shift Colors... underway.
Re: USS Arizona vs. Bizmark
I don't think there is a bulkhead in the turret between guns on KGV or Bismarck, either. I think it's fairly unusual to have one, actually. I believe the French quads had one to separate the two halves of each turret.
-
- Senior Member
- Posts: 408
- Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2009 5:50 pm
- Location: North Carolina, USA
Re: USS Arizona vs. Bizmark
I'm not so sure. The only BB turrets I've crawled around in are Texas, Alabama, and North Carolina. There is a bulkhead between the barrels in the 16" turrets. I can't remember for the Texas, it's been a long time. On the AZ's triple, those guns were... extremely close, more one piece than three separate guns (they elevated as one). Wish I knew where that picture was (thought the movie still is pretty close).Bgile wrote:I don't think there is a bulkhead in the turret between guns on KGV or Bismarck, either. I think it's fairly unusual to have one, actually. I believe the French quads had one to separate the two halves of each turret.
I'm pretty sure the Japanese twin mounts had bulkheads between their guns. See http://www.fischer-tropsch.org/primary_ ... %20N-1.pdf
"All battleships were fitted with longitudinal flashtight bulkheads between the guns, and between the gun loading hoists in the working chambers."
Shift Colors... underway.
Re: USS Arizona vs. Bizmark
I agree that the newer US ships at least had them. I didn't know about the Japanese. I don't believe the British or Germans had them.