Richelieu vs. South Dakota

Historical what if discussions, hypothetical operations, battleship vs. battleship engagements, design your own warship, etc.

Re: Richelieu vs. South Dakota

Postby Dave Saxton » Tue Mar 13, 2012 8:10 pm

Yes it could. It could have been heeled over while maneuvering. Also San Fransisco did run amuck after most of the topside personal were cut down and before Lt. McCandless could get to the conn. McCandless then ordered some hard turns as he thought the rest of the American van would be following. An orderly van had ceased to exist by then though.

The Narrative however, says this is proof that there was another group of IJN warships at a greater range to the northward as indicated by O'Bannon's SG radar set. This was obviously a phantom contact, because there was no other IJN group.

Nonetheless, determining even the exact caliber via physical examination of hits seems to be hit and miss, much less the exact AoF.
Entering a night sea battle is an awesome business.The enveloping darkness, hiding the enemy's.. seems a living thing, malignant and oppressive.Swishing water at the bow and stern mark an inexorable advance toward an unknown destiny.
User avatar
Dave Saxton
Supporter
 
Posts: 1600
Joined: Sat Nov 27, 2004 9:02 pm
Location: Rocky Mountains USA

Bismarck book

Re: Richelieu vs. South Dakota

Postby alecsandros » Wed Mar 14, 2012 2:20 pm

Dave Saxton wrote:
Nonetheless, determining even the exact caliber via physical examination of hits seems to be hit and miss, much less the exact AoF.

What does this mean ... ? I don't understand...
alecsandros
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1838
Joined: Wed Oct 14, 2009 2:33 pm
Location: Romania

Re: Richelieu vs. South Dakota

Postby Dave Saxton » Wed Mar 14, 2012 2:33 pm

Only that is difficult to accurately determine angle of fall from shell hits.
Entering a night sea battle is an awesome business.The enveloping darkness, hiding the enemy's.. seems a living thing, malignant and oppressive.Swishing water at the bow and stern mark an inexorable advance toward an unknown destiny.
User avatar
Dave Saxton
Supporter
 
Posts: 1600
Joined: Sat Nov 27, 2004 9:02 pm
Location: Rocky Mountains USA

Re: Richelieu vs. South Dakota

Postby alecsandros » Thu Mar 15, 2012 4:39 pm

Dave Saxton wrote:Only that is difficult to accurately determine angle of fall from shell hits.

Ah, I see...
Indeed, the estimate for the hit on Jean Bart was ~ 35*, wasn't it ?
Are there any newer sources concerning this shell hit ?

Most discussions we've had concluded that Massachussets fired that crippling shot from 22-24km max, so the AoF shouldn't have been more than 25*.
alecsandros
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1838
Joined: Wed Oct 14, 2009 2:33 pm
Location: Romania

Previous

Return to Hypothetical Naval Scenarios

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest