Dave Saxton wrote:The P-47 and the Zero had elliptical wings.
The clipped wings versions of the Spitfire was done to increase the rate of roll. The Spitfire without clipped wings had a slow rate of roll, which put it at a disadvantage against the FW-190, particularly. The FW-190 had the highest rate of roll of any WWII fighter. Even the clipped wing versions of the Spitfire could not match it.
Other advantages of clipped wings was a reduction in drag, and a much quicker response to the controls when changing direction. Fighters need to cut a balance between stability and instability to be capable of rapid air combat maneuvering. Stability makes them easier and less fatiguing to fly, but it also makes it slower to respond to control inputs.
The main trade off of clipped wings was less lift and higher wing loading, which in turn would reduce the rate of turn, possibly the rate of climb depending the power to weight ratio, and certainly increased the stall speed and reduced the allowable angle of attack at stall. The clipped wing versions would be less forgiving to fly, requiring greater pilot skill and experience to attain the best performance compared to the elliptical winged versions.
It has been a while. Hope you are well. Re elliptical wings, the wing of the Spitfire indeed featured a fully elliptical plan-form, both leading and trailing edges. With respect to the P47, only the trailing edge was elliptical in nature; the leading edge was straight. The Zero wing, I would suggest, was not elliptical in nature: both the leading and trailing edges were straight and the wing-tip was almost circular in plan-form.
Spot on regarding the logic behind the clipping of the Spit Mk 5's wingtips. A lot of the early roll-rate problems suffered by the Spits (and Bf109s and Zeros) were a function of aileron design - both the early fabric coverings utilized and also the manner in which the gap between the leading edge of the aileron and the wing itself was managed. By comparison, the roll-rate of the Fw190A at conventional early war maneuvering speeds was sensational; I do not believe there was any contemporary fighter a/c that could match it. Interestingly enough, the P40 was considered a very dangerous turn fighter due to its impressive roll rate at maneuvering speeds; JG27 pilots in North Africa would studiously decline to enter turning fights with P40s. Another less well known point is that late war US AAC fP47 and P51 series both had impressive high-speed roll-rate performance (say, 300+ mph or so) and unmatched by opposing Axis fighters.
I see that the Battle of Denmark Strait still rages on. Wow.
Rgds / Byron