A KGV in the south atlantic 1982 ?

Naval discussions covering the latter half of the 20th Century.
User avatar
RF
Senior Member
Posts: 7525
Joined: Wed Sep 20, 2006 1:15 pm
Location: Wolverhampton, ENGLAND

Re: A KGV in the south atlantic 1982 ?

Post by RF » Thu Mar 12, 2015 10:18 am

paul.mercer wrote:Gentlemen,
Obviously the Belgrano v a KGv would be no contest......
What would be more interesting would be if the Argentine invasion/landing forces were intercepted off West Falkland just prior to their landings by the KGV.
''Give me a Ping and one Ping only'' - Sean Connery.

Steve Crandell
Senior Member
Posts: 630
Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2014 7:05 pm

Re: A KGV in the south atlantic 1982 ?

Post by Steve Crandell » Thu Mar 12, 2015 12:47 pm

RF wrote:I would think they would, however there were two smaller escort ships accompanying Belgrano and they would have to be reckoned with as well.
The battle would not be determined by naval gunfire. Didn't both sides have missiles? In any case, the British would employ submarines just as in the actual event.

User avatar
RF
Senior Member
Posts: 7525
Joined: Wed Sep 20, 2006 1:15 pm
Location: Wolverhampton, ENGLAND

Re: A KGV in the south atlantic 1982 ?

Post by RF » Thu Mar 12, 2015 1:18 pm

Submarines would certainly be the preferred weapon of the British. Especially as the Argentinians would be left guessing as to how much firepower they really have.....
''Give me a Ping and one Ping only'' - Sean Connery.

paul.mercer
Senior Member
Posts: 645
Joined: Fri Mar 26, 2010 10:25 pm

Re: A KGV in the south atlantic 1982 ?

Post by paul.mercer » Thu Mar 12, 2015 8:56 pm

RF wrote:I would think they would, however there were two smaller escort ships accompanying Belgrano and they would have to be reckoned with as well.
Thanks for that, I would presume that the Belfast would have also had an escort of a couple of frigates or destroyers, I suppose it would then be a walkover for the RN

Post Reply