Steve-M wrote:I would suggest that the climate change aspect is more PR than anything else. More efficient equipment, so long as it doesn't compromise performance, is always desirable as fuel may not always be plentiful, particularly at a local level. It's also good in that it reduces logistical requirements, which is a crucial consideration in any conflict far away from home. Now if they start saying we can't bomb ISIS because the carbon emissions would be too great, that's another story.
Dave Saxton wrote:It's already happened in some ways:
http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing- ... -oil-wells
Users browsing this forum: Yahoo [Bot] and 2 guests