Malvinas/Falklands war - Alleged attack on HMS Invincible

Naval discussions covering the latter half of the 20th Century.
User avatar
marcelo_malara
Senior Member
Posts: 1072
Joined: Sun Oct 02, 2005 11:14 pm
Location: buenos aires

Malvinas/Falklands war - Alleged attack on HMS Invincible

Postby marcelo_malara » Tue Jun 05, 2007 11:58 am

Hi guys:

I have been discussing here in a local forum the alleged attack on May 30th 1982 to the HMS Invincible. Argentine pilots claims that the carrier received one air-launched Exocet and two 250 kg bombs. The official British casualties list gives 3 deads on her crew, two pilots lost in a mission and a seaman. That doesn´t agree with the claimed damage. But then somebody said that the carrier didn´t enter port until august, two months after the end of the war, allegedly to make repairs. What do you think? is this credible?

mike1880
Member
Posts: 71
Joined: Sun Apr 24, 2005 9:00 pm
Location: UK

Postby mike1880 » Tue Jun 05, 2007 1:37 pm

No, not damaged - sunk:

http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread166587/pg24

A replacement was secretly built in the US and everyone who knew the truth was bought off.

Sounds plausible to me...

Mike

User avatar
marcelo_malara
Senior Member
Posts: 1072
Joined: Sun Oct 02, 2005 11:14 pm
Location: buenos aires

Postby marcelo_malara » Tue Jun 05, 2007 4:20 pm

No Mike, that is really nonsense, even here in Argentina is totally disregarded. No way of covering all the casualties caused by a sinking ship, or the silence of thousands sailors who saw it, or the workers that built it. Morever, building a new ship takes years...

ostriker
Member
Posts: 99
Joined: Thu Jun 08, 2006 1:48 pm
Location: Nîmes, Southern France

Postby ostriker » Tue Jun 05, 2007 5:16 pm

marcelo_malara wrote:Morever, building a new ship takes years...


I knew that the US industry was powerfull, but so much! :lol: :lol: :wink:

Bgile
Senior Member
Posts: 3658
Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2005 7:33 pm
Location: Portland, OR, USA

Postby Bgile » Tue Jun 05, 2007 8:31 pm

It would be impossible to hide something like that. It simply didn't happen. Every ship which received damage had stories associated with it. You just can't hide something like that over the passage of time because too many people know about it.

In any case, there were photos and all sorts of corroboration information about everything that happened.

User avatar
marcelo_malara
Senior Member
Posts: 1072
Joined: Sun Oct 02, 2005 11:14 pm
Location: buenos aires

Postby marcelo_malara » Tue Jun 05, 2007 9:20 pm

Hi Bgile:

The supporters of the theory of the attack based their asumptions partly in the fact that the escort carrier HMS Dasher exploded in WWII and the British covered it well after the end of the war.
Do you believe that the carrier could be lightly damaged and was repaired at sea, I mean changing some plates of the damaged skin and repainting?

User avatar
Gary
Senior Member
Posts: 706
Joined: Mon Apr 17, 2006 3:37 pm
Location: Northumberland

Postby Gary » Tue Jun 05, 2007 10:03 pm

Hi all.

There was a similiar "conspiracy theory" in WW2.
The Italians claimed to have hit Warspite below the waterline at Calabria and further claimed that the British covered it up.

The theory was of course, false
God created the world in 6 days.........and on the 7th day he built the Scharnhorst

paul mercer
Member
Posts: 113
Joined: Tue Nov 14, 2006 3:38 pm
Location: Tavistock, West Devon

Postby paul mercer » Wed Jun 06, 2007 7:26 am

What happened to the Argentinian sub that got hit by heliocopters and was beached in South Georgia (I think it was there) - was it repaired or is it still there?

User avatar
marcelo_malara
Senior Member
Posts: 1072
Joined: Sun Oct 02, 2005 11:14 pm
Location: buenos aires

Postby marcelo_malara » Wed Jun 06, 2007 2:39 pm

I don´t know her fate. Anyway, it was a GUPPI updated WWII US Navy sub, already obsolete then.

iankw
Member
Posts: 196
Joined: Wed Nov 10, 2004 11:41 pm
Location: Rotherham, England

Postby iankw » Wed Jun 06, 2007 10:38 pm

I think you mean the Santa Fe which, if I remember correctly was taken out by a hand held missile launch system (something like Milan I think).

Ian

User avatar
marcelo_malara
Senior Member
Posts: 1072
Joined: Sun Oct 02, 2005 11:14 pm
Location: buenos aires

Postby marcelo_malara » Thu Jun 07, 2007 1:10 am

Yes, the Santa Fe. It was taken by helicopter-launched missiles AFAIK, may be Milan.

User avatar
SWORDFISH
Junior Member
Posts: 7
Joined: Mon Jun 04, 2007 4:22 pm
Location: Basingstoke, England

Malvinas/Falklands war - Alleged attack on HMS Invincible

Postby SWORDFISH » Thu Jun 07, 2007 9:53 am

This is my first message on this site.

HMS Invincible was not hit during the South Atlantic Campaign.

The last Exocet-armed Etendard raid on the 30th May did no damage, the exocet was destroyed by 4.5-inch gun fire from HMS Avenger, while HMS Exeter launched their Dart missles, downing two Sky Hawks, both ships having launched their chaff rockets earlier to divert the Exocet. Both ships were unscathed from the bombing attack by the two surviving A-4 attackers. These pilots returned to base and were convinced that they had attacked Invincible successfully. In fact Invincible was many miles away.
Lest We Forget

User avatar
RF
Senior Member
Posts: 7488
Joined: Wed Sep 20, 2006 1:15 pm
Location: Wolverhampton, ENGLAND

Postby RF » Thu Jun 07, 2007 9:58 am

The Santa Fe was captured by the RN and taken to Plymouth as a prize of war.

I am not aware of any serious attack on either of the two RN regular carriers, the official record at the time was that they were completely undamaged.

The Atlantic Conveyor was of course sunk by Skyhawks, but this was a converted container cargo ship used for carrying helicopters, not a regular carrier.
''Give me a Ping and one Ping only'' - Sean Connery.

User avatar
SWORDFISH
Junior Member
Posts: 7
Joined: Mon Jun 04, 2007 4:22 pm
Location: Basingstoke, England

Capture of the Santa Fe

Postby SWORDFISH » Thu Jun 07, 2007 10:46 am

HMS Antrim's Wessex HAS 3 (Humphrey), dropped two Mk 11 depth charges, the Santa Fe's ballast fuel tanks were damaged. HMS Brilliant's Lynx HAS2 arrived five minutes later and launched a Mk46 homimg torpedo which circled under the submirine, the Santa Fe could not submerge, as the torpedo would then intercept. A few minutes later, a Wasp from HMS Endurance joined in the fight and fired two AS-12 air to surface misiles . The first missile hit the conning tower, the second fell 30 yards away. The Wasp returned to the Endurance to rearm, it then returned and an AS-12 was launched, exploded close to the submirine's hull, causing a ballast tank to rupture and a serious leak into the boat. The Santa Fe managed to tie up at the jetty in Grytviken harbour, but by this time it was disabled and later it was scuttled.

The Santa Fe was formerly the USS Catfish (SS-339)
Lest We Forget

User avatar
RF
Senior Member
Posts: 7488
Joined: Wed Sep 20, 2006 1:15 pm
Location: Wolverhampton, ENGLAND

Re: Capture of the Santa Fe

Postby RF » Thu Jun 07, 2007 11:13 am

SWORDFISH wrote: The Santa Fe managed to tie up at the jetty in Grytviken harbour, but by this time it was disabled and later it was scuttled.



I was under the impression that it was refloated and towed to Plymouth.
''Give me a Ping and one Ping only'' - Sean Connery.


Return to “Naval History Post-1945”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest