Bismarck - magazine protection, funnel uptake question

Discussions about the history of the ship, technical details, etc.

Bismarck - magazine protection, funnel uptake question

Postby alecsandros » Thu May 17, 2012 7:39 am

HEllo,

Looking more into the plans, I found 2 other things that I don't have answers for:

1) did Bismarck have extra magazine protection ?
From the plans, I can see the vertical protection consists of the 320mm main belt + 120mm inclined portion of panzer deck + armored bulkhead (45mm below the scarp, 30mm above it). The horizontal protection appears to be 100mm Wh.
My question : did the walls of the main magazines have extra armor ? Some splinter armor perhaps ?

2) How were the funnell uptakes protected from damage ?
As far as I can see, above the panzer deck there are 5 x 2 uptakes that transfer smoke from the boiler rooms to the funnell above. They were located in the sections XI, XII and XIII, spanning about 30m in length, 15 in width and some 5 meters in height.

Now, those uptakes had only citadel protection (145mm KC n/A + 30mm transverse Wh bulkhead).
This is not enough to stop heavy gunfire.

In the event of a battle, a single shell explosion exactly in the center of the funnel uptakes would destroy them all, leaving the boiler rooms unable to evacuate smoke (in fact, they could evacuate it, but it would be inside the ship)

This would almost certainly lead to drastic speed reduction and death.

What am I missing ?
alecsandros
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1830
Joined: Wed Oct 14, 2009 2:33 pm
Location: Romania

Bismarck book

Re: Bismarck - magazine protection, funnel uptake question

Postby Thorsten Wahl » Sun May 20, 2012 7:47 pm

In general all bulkheadplates around the magazines had somwhat increased thickness by about 7 or 8 mm. So if a certain bulkhead has 12 mm thickness according Bauvorschrift - if a magazine is behind this bulkhead thickness is increased to ~20mm
Thorsten Wahl
Senior Member
 
Posts: 414
Joined: Mon Apr 27, 2009 4:17 pm

Re: Bismarck - magazine protection, funnel uptake question

Postby Herr Nilsson » Mon May 21, 2012 10:37 am

Thorsten Wahl wrote:In general all bulkheadplates around the magazines had somwhat increased thickness by about 7 or 8 mm. So if a certain bulkhead has 12 mm thickness according Bauvorschrift - if a magazine is behind this bulkhead thickness is increased to ~20mm


Because the specification of the hull tells something different at first glance, I'm desperately trying to verify this. Please, could you give me a tip where I have to look?

Hi Thorsten,

in der BBV steht doch, dass die Munitionskammerschotte wie die angrenzenden Hauptquer- und Seitenlängsschotte zu bauen sind. Unter dem Panzerdeck ist ein 60 cm hoher und 12 mm dicker Streifen von Torpedoschott zu Torpedoschott einzubauen. Davon ausgenommen sind nur die verstärkten Dockschotte sowie die Turmtrageschotte. Munitionskammerschotte werden mit keinem Wort erwähnt. Übersehe ich was?
Regards

Marc
User avatar
Herr Nilsson
Senior Member
 
Posts: 336
Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2004 11:19 am
Location: Germany

Re: Bismarck - magazine protection, funnel uptake question

Postby Thorsten Wahl » Mon May 21, 2012 12:04 pm

In the Bauvorschrift ther is a simple statment thicknesses according to drawings.

I stumbled over it some days ago, when I read some new stuff(for me). Unfortunately I did not notice the reference document as I was suprised and chip were it is stored is now defective.
maybe
Kriegserfahrungen Tirpitz Oberbaurat Krux, or
Schiffskunde Tirpitz
Thorsten Wahl
Senior Member
 
Posts: 414
Joined: Mon Apr 27, 2009 4:17 pm

Re: Bismarck - magazine protection, funnel uptake question

Postby Herr Nilsson » Mon May 21, 2012 12:16 pm

Thank you, I will check it this evening.
Regards

Marc
User avatar
Herr Nilsson
Senior Member
 
Posts: 336
Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2004 11:19 am
Location: Germany

Re: Bismarck - magazine protection, funnel uptake question

Postby Thorsten Wahl » Tue May 22, 2012 7:29 pm

Ifound the statement in USNTME Technical Report No. 224-45 Latest German Battleships put into Service - Bismarck - Tirpitz Hull Construction

but the increase in thickness was only at the upper platformdeck
Attachments
Munitionkammer1.jpg
Munitionkammer1.jpg (23.3 KiB) Viewed 622 times
Thorsten Wahl
Senior Member
 
Posts: 414
Joined: Mon Apr 27, 2009 4:17 pm

Re: Bismarck - magazine protection, funnel uptake question

Postby Herr Nilsson » Tue May 22, 2012 8:37 pm

Thank you !Now I understand. But this refers only to the deck itself not to the walls and it wasn't made to increase the magazine protection. The reason to strengthen the upper platform deck was to prevent deflection of the deck in two different cases:
-Full powder room and lift winch of the shell room loaded
-Almost empty powder room and water pressure in a flooded shell room
Regards

Marc
User avatar
Herr Nilsson
Senior Member
 
Posts: 336
Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2004 11:19 am
Location: Germany


Return to Bismarck General Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests