Hi Sean,Wadinga wrote: "you don't consider Winston Churchill's account of the interest he and the Admiralty took simultaneously in the Crete and Bismarck battles"
I assure you that I do, but I have posted the evidence that almost the whole Admiralty War Room was only focusing on the tactical decisions to be taken to sink Bismarck between May 24 and 27, apparently leaving Cunningham to handle the decisions needed to face Crete crisis, just sending him signals asking to do his utmost and leaving him the operational decisions how to sacrifice the whole Mediterranean Fleet if needed......Apparently WSC wanted to actively participate in the tactical decisions regarding the Bismarck.....
It's you who fails to produce any evidence that in the War Room any special attention was given to the tactical decisions regarding Crete during that days, because it was not.
Are you joking ? possibly you have not yet digested the ADM 205/10.....most indigestible for the "deniers", I see.....you wrote: "How do you know what the certain aspects and the prima facie are?"
Starting page 331 to Pound from the Admiralty Board secretary:
and page 332 (from Pound to Alexander):
As you see, the "aspects" are made fully explicit by people who should have been able to understand them and this explicit explanation should be "heard" by deaf ears and "read" by blind eyes, as a very wise person (who refused to continue this useless discussion with the deniers) wrote here recently.
Please, before posting, read the documents that are in your hands and that we have explained to you in several pages in this same thread, avoiding to have people loosing time repeating again and again the same things that YOU SIMPLY DON'T WANT TO ACCEPT "a priori", exposing yourself in this miserable way to desperately support your own denying agenda.
Bye, Alberto