Search found 929 matches
- Fri Jul 12, 2024 11:36 am
- Forum: Hypothetical Naval Scenarios
- Topic: Redesigning Bismarck
- Replies: 48
- Views: 79955
Re: Redesigning Bismarck
Screenshot 2024-01-02 072847.png 12,7 cm dual purpose as per 1942 salvo timing <5 sec (mechanized ammo transfer from the magazines to the barrel) the 28 cm armament of D and E was driven by scheduling commitments. Any other gun required about one year additional development. As Germany has only few...
- Fri Jun 07, 2024 11:56 am
- Forum: Naval Technology
- Topic: Prinz Eugen deck armor thickness
- Replies: 4
- Views: 3153
Re: Prinz Eugen deck armor thickness
Unterlagen und Richtlinien zur Bestimmung der Hauptkampfentfernung und der Geschoßwahl Heft e schwere Kreuzer states for Hipper class
30 mm (third deck) as ballistic relevant.
30 mm (third deck) as ballistic relevant.
- Thu May 30, 2024 6:38 am
- Forum: Hypothetical Naval Scenarios
- Topic: Deutschland class with improved speed
- Replies: 44
- Views: 10665
Re: Deutschland class with improved speed
https://www.kbismarck.org/forum/viewtopic.php?p=86471#p86471 from an old post rough comparison Weights ...............................AGS................................Prinz Eugen Hull..........................4000...............................5500 Armor........................2800...................
- Wed May 29, 2024 9:55 am
- Forum: Hypothetical Naval Scenarios
- Topic: Deutschland class with improved speed
- Replies: 44
- Views: 10665
Re: Deutschland class with improved speed
As far as I know all WW2 US cruisers had a relatively shallow but comparatively thick armour at the waterline and were intendet to present a 30 degrees target angle.marcelo_malara wrote: ↑Mon May 27, 2024 3:00 pm Whereas Hipper maximum belt armour is given at 80mm, Baltimore´s is listed as 6", almost double.
- Sat May 25, 2024 9:15 am
- Forum: Bismarck General Discussion
- Topic: Bismarck's TDS so abysmal?
- Replies: 71
- Views: 29604
- Fri May 24, 2024 11:51 am
- Forum: Bismarck General Discussion
- Topic: Bismarck's TDS so abysmal?
- Replies: 71
- Views: 29604
Re: Bismarck's TDS so abysmal?
I am quite surprised to find that-- so far as I know -- in this discussion no-one has yet made any reference to Appendix D-9 of the U.S. Naval Technical Mission to Europe Roport No. 227-45 "Underwater Explosion Research in the German Navy". It's very comprehensive, and -- although it does...
- Tue May 21, 2024 6:16 am
- Forum: Bismarck General Discussion
- Topic: Bismarck's TDS so abysmal?
- Replies: 71
- Views: 29604
Re: Bismarck's TDS so abysmal?
no Bismarcks TDS was fullsize tested against 300 kg S1... your AFAIK was wrong. https://www.kbismarck.org/forum/download/file.php?mode=view&id=4317 In Addition the blast effect of S1 is about 1,4 times of the Blasteffect of TNT https://www.kbismarck.org/forum/posting.php?mode=edit&f=1&p=...
- Sat May 04, 2024 9:34 am
- Forum: Naval Weapons
- Topic: Differences between 10,5-cm (4.1") Krupp Naval guns S.K. L/40 and L/45?
- Replies: 82
- Views: 232925
Re: Differences between 10,5-cm (4.1") Krupp Naval guns S.K. L/40 and L/45?
Handbuch für an Bord befindliche Geschütze Stand 01.01.1939 g.Kdos
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Z02ohI ... p=drivesdk
Technical data. 2 cm - 10,5 cm guns.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Z02ohI ... p=drivesdk
Technical data. 2 cm - 10,5 cm guns.
- Fri Apr 05, 2024 11:42 am
- Forum: Bismarck General Discussion
- Topic: Bismarck's armor against long range hits
- Replies: 28
- Views: 16598
Re: Bismarck's armor against long range hits
ich hatte glaube ich im Marinearchiv angefragt ob sich wer beteiligt. Leider kann ich den Thread nicht mehr finden. jedenfalls habe ich bestellt und alles finanziert und die Dokumente aus Kew in Papierform erhalten. waren zwei oder drei Bestellungen eine 2010 2011 Später habe ich die eingescannt und...
- Thu Apr 04, 2024 1:28 pm
- Forum: Bismarck General Discussion
- Topic: Bismarck's armor against long range hits
- Replies: 28
- Views: 16598
Re: Bismarck's armor against long range hits
you may take a recent post of mine at the navweaps forum: https://www.tapatalk.com/groups/warships1discussionboards/rank-the-battleships-t50024-s640.html#p1102205 SUPP 22/68 https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B12aaMD-x_k_V0xSTlphdXgtak0/view?usp=sharing&resourcekey=0-f7VYw107wyKGcNWCoxs7Ug SUPP 22...
- Wed Apr 03, 2024 7:36 pm
- Forum: Bismarck General Discussion
- Topic: Bismarck's armor against long range hits
- Replies: 28
- Views: 16598
- Sat Feb 03, 2024 8:10 pm
- Forum: Hypothetical Naval Scenarios
- Topic: Fast Battleship League Table
- Replies: 169
- Views: 150742
Re: Fast Battleship League Table
Im Thoddy or Thoddyx or Thorsten Wahl
- Sat Feb 03, 2024 11:18 am
- Forum: Hypothetical Naval Scenarios
- Topic: Fast Battleship League Table
- Replies: 169
- Views: 150742
Re: Fast Battleship League Table
Marinearchiv-Forum
- Wed Jan 31, 2024 7:34 am
- Forum: Hypothetical Naval Scenarios
- Topic: Redesigning Bismarck
- Replies: 48
- Views: 79955
Re: Redesigning Bismarck
If you could be a bit more specific, I could try to look some numbers up. You might want to refer to the paper Strafford Morss and I wrote on the machinery plant of USS Massachusetts (BB-59) in Warship International about 15 years ago. It should be up on JSTOR. This contains a series of complete he...
- Tue Jan 30, 2024 10:31 am
- Forum: Hypothetical Naval Scenarios
- Topic: Redesigning Bismarck
- Replies: 48
- Views: 79955
Re: Redesigning Bismarck
Thank you I meant max amount of steam produced by the boilers available for propulsion and auxilliaries. I suspect its about 800 tons steam per hour for the complete powerplant at 212,000 SHP +~maybe 150 tons per hour reserve for 254,000 SHP at overload condition the article 2 only mentions the dail...