Search found 1528 matches
- Fri Jan 25, 2019 2:16 am
- Forum: Naval Weapons
- Topic: fusing shells
- Replies: 4
- Views: 4769
Re: fusing shells
Sorry to have been so long away. During wartime, the shells were fuzed and ready for use. Normally this would not have been a major safety issue as the fuzes had built in safety devices which prevented the shell from arming.
- Sat May 12, 2018 5:04 pm
- Forum: Naval History (1922-1945)
- Topic: Warspite's Very Long Range Shot at Battle of Calabria
- Replies: 13
- Views: 16425
Re: Warspite's Very Long Range Shot at Battle of Calabria
I like the way you used Casey at the Bat to illustrate your point
- Mon May 08, 2017 7:57 pm
- Forum: World War II
- Topic: Battle of the Bulge
- Replies: 20
- Views: 17962
Re: Battle of the Bulge
All in all, I would say that the German offensive was something of a forlorn hope in the Victorian sense in that it could do little more than demonstrate the Wehrmacht was still an entity to be regarded with caution. It made a certain amount of sense in tactical terms, but strategically it was a mis...
- Sat Apr 08, 2017 3:32 am
- Forum: Bismarck General Discussion
- Topic: Ian Ballantyne's views on Bismarcks distruction
- Replies: 15
- Views: 12719
Re: Ian Ballantyne's views on Bismarcks distruction
Was not Titanic's designer Thomas Andrews?
As to the late Anthony Preston, he was often wrong and at times self contradictory.
As to the late Anthony Preston, he was often wrong and at times self contradictory.
- Tue Nov 22, 2016 12:09 am
- Forum: Bismarck General Discussion
- Topic: Cover up synopsis
- Replies: 623
- Views: 60862
Re: Cover up synopsis
If too difficult for your agenda, please try at least to help understanding where did Tovey take the word "temporarily" from (on May 30), when Capt. Leach had not yet mentioned any "more favorable opportunity" ? Presumably, because he was writing after the fact and knew PoW exch...
- Tue Aug 16, 2016 7:56 pm
- Forum: Hypothetical Naval Scenarios
- Topic: What if: Bismarck or Prinz Eugen made smoke at 5:45 and accelerated at max speed
- Replies: 27
- Views: 13379
Re: What if: Bismarck or Prinz Eugen made smoke at 5:45 and accelerated at max speed
They used chlorosulfonic acid.
- Mon Aug 15, 2016 7:33 pm
- Forum: The Age of Sail (1571-1860)
- Topic: ships sailing from London to Boston in 1820-1850 range?
- Replies: 2
- Views: 8179
Re: ships sailing from London to Boston in 1820-1850 range?
I would think Bristol would have also been a major departing port as well.
- Thu Jun 23, 2016 10:59 pm
- Forum: Bismarck General Discussion
- Topic: Bismarck firing procedures at DS
- Replies: 967
- Views: 116582
Re: Bismarck firing procedures at DS
Agreed. Besides, were there not several main armament problems on Prinz Eugen during the action? If I remember correctly B turret missed a salvo and then fired only one gun in the turret for the next 13 ordered salvos due to a technical problem, while operational errors caused A turret to miss four ...
- Thu Jun 23, 2016 10:39 pm
- Forum: Bismarck General Discussion
- Topic: Bismarck firing procedures at DS
- Replies: 967
- Views: 116582
Re: Bismarck firing procedures at DS
I don't think Bismarck fired particularly fast after Schneider ordered fire for effect once the Gabelgruppe had been spotted. Hood and Bismarck were on a converging course which would have caused rapid changes in range from salvo to salvo; additionally, Hood's course was slightly curving due to Holl...
- Mon Jun 20, 2016 7:55 pm
- Forum: Bismarck General Discussion
- Topic: why did lutjens break radio silence
- Replies: 31
- Views: 12903
Re: why did lutjens break radio silence
Gentlemen, I'm not sure if this is a myth, but was Lindemannn not heard to say "I will not have my ship shot from under my arse"? If so then it must have been Lutjens who hesitated in opening fire.I have been told that in a sea battle, the Admiral controls the battle but the Captain contr...
- Sat Jun 18, 2016 12:26 am
- Forum: Bismarck General Discussion
- Topic: Bismarck firing procedures at DS
- Replies: 967
- Views: 116582
Re: Bismarck firing procedures at DS
Yes, one would normally wait for spotting the fall of shot of the deflection salvo before firing the bracket group to test range. There were instances where Bismarck fired deflection salvos very far short--during the reengagement with Prince of Wales and when engaging Sheffield on the evening of the...
- Fri Jun 17, 2016 7:38 pm
- Forum: Bismarck General Discussion
- Topic: Bismarck firing procedures at DS
- Replies: 967
- Views: 116582
Re: Bismarck firing procedures at DS
Hello Alberto, Normally in opening fire it was usual in the Kriegsmarine to fire a deflection salvo with all main battery guns--i.e., in Bismarck's and Prinz Eugen's cases, all four turrets. This initial salvo or broadside was intended to test deflection---check fall of shot for line, rather than ra...
- Wed Jun 15, 2016 7:26 pm
- Forum: Bismarck General Discussion
- Topic: why did lutjens break radio silence
- Replies: 31
- Views: 12903
Re: why did lutjens break radio silence
Do you see any mystery in Lutjens behaviour or is too much made of it.You see what with his hesitation in opening fire on Hood - he had orders not to engage enemy battleships but he was already under fire - I think perhaps a little too much is made of Bismarck's delay in opening fire on Holland's s...
- Wed Jun 15, 2016 5:01 pm
- Forum: Bismarck General Discussion
- Topic: why did lutjens break radio silence
- Replies: 31
- Views: 12903
Re: why did lutjens break radio silence
The 'long message' was sent over a period of 45 or so minutes, but was broken down into three segments of about 200 words each as per Enigma protocols. Each of these segments could be sent by an average telegraphist in about four minutes, with a long enough pause in between each segment for an ackno...
- Fri Jun 10, 2016 5:04 pm
- Forum: Naval Weapons
- Topic: Modern AAA
- Replies: 5
- Views: 8677
Re: Modern AAA
Hi Steve,
I believe they have proximity fuzes small enough for 4cm now.
I believe they have proximity fuzes small enough for 4cm now.