150/152 mm gun turret locations

Discussions about the history of the ship, technical details, etc.

Moderator: Bill Jurens

spicmart
Member
Posts: 58
Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2009 5:41 pm

150/152 mm gun turret locations

Post by spicmart »

Reading the comparison between the Bismarck and Richelieu designs the German engineers seemed to be a bit astonished about the configuration and location of the Rich's MA guns, which enabled her to fire a 9 x 152 mm gun broadside with three triple turrets compared to the Bis' 6 x 150 mm with three twins. Thus the French ship saves a lot of weight for a heavier broadside to one side at least.
Was there a specific reason why Germany (and other nations) wouldn't adopt the French solution against the weight gain of their battleships?
The Scharnhorsts would have especially benefitted.
dunmunro
Senior Member
Posts: 4023
Joined: Sat Oct 22, 2005 1:25 am
Location: Langley BC Canada

Re: 150/152 mm gun turret locations

Post by dunmunro »

spicmart wrote: Fri Sep 10, 2021 4:22 pm Reading the comparison between the Bismarck and Richelieu designs the German engineers seemed to be a bit astonished about the configuration and location of the Rich's MA guns, which enabled her to fire a 9 x 152 mm gun broadside with three triple turrets compared to the Bis' 6 x 150 mm with three twins. Thus the French ship saves a lot of weight for a heavier broadside to one side at least.
Was there a specific reason why Germany (and other nations) wouldn't adopt the French solution against the weight gain of their battleships?
The Scharnhorsts would have especially benefitted.
The layout of Richelieu was aided by having all 15in guns forward but as the 152mm turrets were not staggered, they would interfere with each on some broadside bearings, especially when the target was abreast or forward of the beam. The Richelieu was able to bring a greater proportion of her 152mm guns to bear on either beam and in that sense saved weight.
User avatar
marcelo_malara
Senior Member
Posts: 1354
Joined: Sun Oct 02, 2005 11:14 pm
Location: buenos aires

Re: 150/152 mm gun turret locations

Post by marcelo_malara »

You mean putting one secondary turret in the center line. That is easier to do in Richelieu, it was done in the stern with no primary turrets around. To do this in Bismarck would mean that the 6" turret needs to super fire Bruno or Cesar, and that would put some weight high in the ship. Yes, it was done in Yamato.
hans zurbriggen
Member
Posts: 140
Joined: Sat Dec 21, 2019 8:15 am

Re: 150/152 mm gun turret locations

Post by hans zurbriggen »

Hello Mr. spicmart,
Germans possibly referred to the original Richelieu design, given-up in 1939 (or they were simply wrong evaluating her capabilities).

Richelieu could bring to bear 9 guns only exactly astern (side turrets could not be trained inboard, not even by a single degee), 6 from directly astern up to 48° from bow (centre turret could train 132° both sides), only 3 guns if attacked from 48° up to 10°from bow (side turrets could train 170°), from 10° to 0°from bow there was a blind sector of 20°ahead for the 150 mm guns.
Original Richelieu design was for 5 triple 150 mm turrets (turret could elevate up to 90° and it had been designed as a double purpose one). This would have been a very good arrangement (with actually 9 guns capable of firing broadside). Shell loading problems at more than 45° elevation (due to weight) and turret slow training/elevating rate prevented to use them as a.a. guns, therefore pure a.a. guns (6 100 mm twin turrets with bad sectors ahead and astern) were installed at centre ship instead of the 2 150 mm turrets that would have been placed at beam (the only ones capable of firing ahead, with a 180° training arc).
Bismarck could use always at least 4, mostly 6 150 mm guns: a much better arrangement. Of course, double purpose guns would have allowed Bismarck to have a larger number of guns for both usages.

Same applies to Richelieu main armament, with a totally blind sector of 48° astern and another 18° per side where only 4 main guns could bear (TI): French engineers gave up the all-forward design already with the planned 4th ship of the class, Gascogne.

hans
spicmart
Member
Posts: 58
Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2009 5:41 pm

Re: 150/152 mm gun turret locations

Post by spicmart »

Thanks for the answers.
hans zurbriggen
Member
Posts: 140
Joined: Sat Dec 21, 2019 8:15 am

Re: 150/152 mm gun turret locations

Post by hans zurbriggen »

Hello Mr. Spicmart,
as an aside, third and forth ship of Richelieu class would have been finally able to fire 9 150 mm guns broadsides.
Clemenceau would have had 4 150 mm triple turrets (2 centreline aft and 2 at beam sides), while Gascogne would have exploited "all-centerline" approach with only 3 150 mm triple turrets on centerline (2 superfiring each other and 380 mm TI fore, and 1 superfiring TII aft), best arrangement, with some topweight more. However, neither would have used 150 mm as a.a. guns anymore.

hans
spicmart
Member
Posts: 58
Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2009 5:41 pm

Re: 150/152 mm gun turret locations

Post by spicmart »

Thank you, Hans. I will take a look asap.
Post Reply