US fleet sail before attack on Pearl harbour.
-
- Senior Member
- Posts: 553
- Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2011 1:00 pm
Re: US fleet sail before attack on Pearl harbour.
Halsey was sent south to look for the carriers due to radio intercepts of messages from a destroyer unit normally associated with carrier plane guard duty. The intercept suggested they were around Johnston Island. It wasn't until after noon that the Army advised Com14th of the radar track Lockard and Elliott developed at that radar installation on the north side of Oahu. (Now what was that name again?)
- Dave Saxton
- Supporter
- Posts: 3148
- Joined: Sat Nov 27, 2004 9:02 pm
- Location: Rocky Mountains USA
Re: US fleet sail before attack on Pearl harbour.
LOLOpanaPointer wrote: ↑Wed Jun 10, 2020 11:30 am It wasn't until after noon that the Army advised Com14th of the radar track Lockard and Elliott developed at that radar installation on the north side of Oahu. (Now what was that name again?)
Entering a night sea battle is an awesome business.The enveloping darkness, hiding the enemy's.. seems a living thing, malignant and oppressive.Swishing water at the bow and stern mark an inexorable advance toward an unknown destiny.
Re: US fleet sail before attack on Pearl harbour.
T/O
My gut feeling is that the Japanese would have lost a lot more planes but the US would have been permanently deprived of more battleships than historic unless they had sufficient air cover.
As for Halsey? Well,I suppose a lot would depend on who got the first blow in first and where. If the Japanese are busy tearing up the battleships en masse then I wonder whether Halsey could have ambushed them like Fletcher & Spruance did at Midway.
The grand picture would end up the same - the US prevail. Pearl Harbor was a brilliantly executed, but stupid plan. Perhaps if the Japanese had lost a lot of experienced pilots at this historical alternative the war may have ended earlier, say early 1945. The allies still had the various islands to occupy. I suppose an interesting question is whether the Philippines could have been defended had the Japanese plans been discovered say 24 hrs earlier (or whatever). A defended Philippines would really put the cat amongst the pigeons and perhaps saved Malaya/Singapore in the process.
But that's a lot of what ifs!
My gut feeling is that the Japanese would have lost a lot more planes but the US would have been permanently deprived of more battleships than historic unless they had sufficient air cover.
As for Halsey? Well,I suppose a lot would depend on who got the first blow in first and where. If the Japanese are busy tearing up the battleships en masse then I wonder whether Halsey could have ambushed them like Fletcher & Spruance did at Midway.
The grand picture would end up the same - the US prevail. Pearl Harbor was a brilliantly executed, but stupid plan. Perhaps if the Japanese had lost a lot of experienced pilots at this historical alternative the war may have ended earlier, say early 1945. The allies still had the various islands to occupy. I suppose an interesting question is whether the Philippines could have been defended had the Japanese plans been discovered say 24 hrs earlier (or whatever). A defended Philippines would really put the cat amongst the pigeons and perhaps saved Malaya/Singapore in the process.
But that's a lot of what ifs!
-
- Senior Member
- Posts: 553
- Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2011 1:00 pm
Re: US fleet sail before attack on Pearl harbour.
Alan Zimm's book on Pearl Harbor might interest you.
As for Halsey, the NKB was achingly aware that the USN carriers were "out there somewhere" and they patrolled accordingly. There wouldn't have been an ambush scenario.
As for Halsey, the NKB was achingly aware that the USN carriers were "out there somewhere" and they patrolled accordingly. There wouldn't have been an ambush scenario.
-
- Senior Member
- Posts: 1658
- Joined: Sun Mar 06, 2011 1:06 am
Re: US fleet sail before attack on Pearl harbour.
Interesting document covering US Army defenses on Oahu. I suspect there were probably more ground-based AA weapons than aboard the ships.
https://www.armyupress.army.mil/Portals ... Harbor.pdf
B
https://www.armyupress.army.mil/Portals ... Harbor.pdf
B
-
- Senior Member
- Posts: 553
- Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2011 1:00 pm
Re: US fleet sail before attack on Pearl harbour.
And the source, I suspect, for that document: http://www.ibiblio.org/pha/pha/Byron Angel wrote: ↑Tue Jun 16, 2020 9:23 pm Interesting document covering US Army defenses on Oahu. I suspect there were probably more ground-based AA weapons than aboard the ships.
https://www.armyupress.army.mil/Portals ... Harbor.pdf
B