What would be more interesting would be if the Argentine invasion/landing forces were intercepted off West Falkland just prior to their landings by the KGV.paul.mercer wrote:Gentlemen,
Obviously the Belgrano v a KGv would be no contest......
A KGV in the south atlantic 1982 ?
Re: A KGV in the south atlantic 1982 ?
''Give me a Ping and one Ping only'' - Sean Connery.
-
- Senior Member
- Posts: 908
- Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2014 7:05 pm
Re: A KGV in the south atlantic 1982 ?
The battle would not be determined by naval gunfire. Didn't both sides have missiles? In any case, the British would employ submarines just as in the actual event.RF wrote:I would think they would, however there were two smaller escort ships accompanying Belgrano and they would have to be reckoned with as well.
Re: A KGV in the south atlantic 1982 ?
Submarines would certainly be the preferred weapon of the British. Especially as the Argentinians would be left guessing as to how much firepower they really have.....
''Give me a Ping and one Ping only'' - Sean Connery.
-
- Senior Member
- Posts: 1195
- Joined: Fri Mar 26, 2010 10:25 pm
Re: A KGV in the south atlantic 1982 ?
Thanks for that, I would presume that the Belfast would have also had an escort of a couple of frigates or destroyers, I suppose it would then be a walkover for the RNRF wrote:I would think they would, however there were two smaller escort ships accompanying Belgrano and they would have to be reckoned with as well.